Legal AI Appliance

AI for lawyers, without sending privilege to the cloud.

The productivity of generative AI — for matters, memos, and client files that never leave your building.

DPLYD puts a fully managed AI appliance inside your firm's perimeter. Privileged material stays privileged. No third-party API sees your work product.

Book a Demo Talk to Sales
▲ ABOVE · THE CLOUD third-party API
◇ frontier LLM ◇ public cloud ◇ shared tenancy
≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿≈∿
WATERLINE
↑ your firm's boundary ↑
DPLYD Appliance ON-PREM
▾ YOUR MATTERS — STAY HOME
privileged work product client files matter data

"What's beneath the waterline is your business."

BUILT TO THE STANDARD OF SOC 2 HIPAA CMMC L2 certifications in progress
The Trade

The trade you've been asked to make.

Every cloud AI tool asks your firm to ship its most sensitive information — privileged communications, deal documents, client PHI, litigation strategy — to someone else's servers to get an answer back.

For a law firm, that's not a convenience question. It's a duty question. Model Rule 1.6, client outside-counsel guidelines, and the privilege itself all point the same direction: the file shouldn't leave.

You built your security architecture to keep it home. That instinct was right. AI shouldn't be the exception that undoes it.

The part nobody tells you

Keeping the file local isn't enough. The index is the leak.

Most "on-prem-friendly" legal AI keeps the document local — then ships an index of it to the cloud. That distinction is marketing, not security.

An index derived from your file is a second copy of the sensitive part:

[¶]
CHUNKS

Verbatim passages lifted straight out of the document. Not a summary. The text itself.

[≈]
EMBEDDINGS

Encode the meaning, and are reversible enough to reconstruct the source.

[#]
KEYWORDS

Client names, matter numbers, deal codenames, in plaintext.

[⊟]
METADATA

Authors, dates, case IDs, file paths: a map of everything you hold.

[⇄]
RELATIONSHIPS

Which parties, entities, and documents connect. Disclosure without a single sentence leaving.

The original file never moved. The privileged information did.

A cloud index of local content is exfiltration the moment it can disclose, infer, search, or reconstruct protected material outside your walls. DPLYD keeps the index on the same side of the boundary as the file. Always.

The Approach

Bring the AI to the data — not the reverse.

DPLYD is a managed AI appliance that lives on your perimeter. The model runs where your files already are.

[⊡]

On your perimeter

Documents never cross your boundary. Full generative capability, zero egress of privileged content.

[↻]

Fully managed

We own the hardware, updates, and lifecycle. Your team operates; we maintain. No servers for your IT to babysit.

[≡]

Predictable economics

Fixed monthly. No per-seat licensing. No per-token metering. No capex. Every lawyer, paralegal, and staff member works from the same appliance — price doesn't climb because you gave the whole litigation team access.

The Workload

General-purpose intelligence, with legal where it counts.

DPLYD isn't a narrow legal point-tool. The appliance runs capable general models — the same drafting, summarizing, and reasoning your team would reach for anywhere — plus legal-specific workflows on top.

Draft, redline, and summarize across large matter sets Issue-spot and triage document productions Assist motion and memo drafting against your own precedent bank Search your firm's knowledge base — closed deals, prior briefs, templates — grounded in your work product, not the open internet Intake and conflict-check support

One appliance serves the whole firm. Legal work gets legal handling; everything else your people do with AI runs on the same secure box.

The Record

Audit-ready by construction.

Compliance shouldn't be a slide deck you assemble the week before a client security review. DPLYD produces an immutable, exportable record of every AI interaction: what ran, on which documents, under what policy, with what result.

When a client's outside-counsel guidelines demand proof — or when a malpractice question surfaces two years later — the evidence already exists.

"trust us" ──▶ evidence on demand.
SENTINEL · AUDIT LOG immutable
matter_id  bound
access_scope  verified
privilege_flag  enforced
data_boundary  enforced
▸ export evidence 
The Comparison

DPLYD vs. cloud legal AI.

Cloud legal AI DPLYD
Where your data goes Shipped to a third-party API Never leaves your perimeter
The index Copied to the cloud Stays inside your boundary
Pricing Per lawyer, per month Fixed monthly — no per-seat, no per-token
Scope Legal tasks only General AI + legal workflows, one appliance
Infrastructure Someone else's cloud Managed hardware on your premises
Air-gapped / classified work Not possible Supported by design
Audit evidence Contractual assurance Immutable, exportable record

The cloud tools are good software. But they solve for legal output while asking you to accept data egress as the cost. DPLYD refuses the trade: the intelligence comes to the data.

Who It's For

Built for the firms cloud AI can't serve.

Some work simply cannot go to a third-party API: government and defense counsel, matters under protective order, clients whose outside-counsel guidelines forbid third-party AI processing, and any firm that treats privilege as non-negotiable.

If your answer to "where does the data go?" has to be nowhereDPLYD is the only version of this that works.

See it on your own matters.

A 30-minute walkthrough of the appliance, running on your data, inside your boundary.

▸ BOOK A DEMO
Book a Demo